Priority Model
Casbin's Priority Model for managing policies with different priorities
Casbin supports priority-based policy loading.
Load Policy with Implicit Priority
Priority is determined by policy order: policies appearing first have higher priority.
model.conf:
[policy_effect]
e = priority(p.eft) || denyLoad Policy with Explicit Priority
See also: casbin#550
Lower priority values indicate higher priority. Non-numerical priority values are placed last rather than causing errors.
Token name convention:
The standard priority token name in policy definitions is "priority". To use a custom token name, call e.SetFieldIndex() after initializing the enforcer and reload policies (see the full example in TestCustomizedFieldIndex).
model.conf:
[policy_definition]
p = customized_priority, sub, obj, act, eftGolang code example:
e, _ := NewEnforcer("./example/priority_model_explicit_customized.conf",
"./example/priority_policy_explicit_customized.csv")
// Due to the customized priority token, the enforcer fails to handle the priority.
ok, err := e.Enforce("bob", "data2", "read") // the result will be `true, nil`
// Set PriorityIndex and reload
e.SetFieldIndex("p", constant.PriorityIndex, 0)
err := e.LoadPolicy()
if err != nil {
log.Fatalf("LoadPolicy: %v", err)
}
ok, err := e.Enforce("bob", "data2", "read") // the result will be `false, nil`Explicit priority currently supports only AddPolicy and AddPolicies. Avoid changing the priority attribute when calling UpdatePolicy.
model.conf:
[request_definition]
r = sub, obj, act
[policy_definition]
p = priority, sub, obj, act, eft
[role_definition]
g = _, _
[policy_effect]
e = priority(p.eft) || deny
[matchers]
m = g(r.sub, p.sub) && r.obj == p.obj && r.act == p.actpolicy.csv
p, 10, data1_deny_group, data1, read, deny
p, 10, data1_deny_group, data1, write, deny
p, 10, data2_allow_group, data2, read, allow
p, 10, data2_allow_group, data2, write, allow
p, 1, alice, data1, write, allow
p, 1, alice, data1, read, allow
p, 1, bob, data2, read, deny
g, bob, data2_allow_group
g, alice, data1_deny_grouprequest:
alice, data1, write --> true // because `p, 1, alice, data1, write, allow` has the highest priority
bob, data2, read --> false
bob, data2, write --> true // because bob has the role of `data2_allow_group` which has the right to write data2, and there's no deny policy with higher priorityLoad Policy with Priority Based on Role and User Hierarchy
The role and user inheritance structure must form multiple trees, not graphs. When a user has multiple roles, ensure the user occupies the same hierarchy level in each tree. When two roles share the same level, the policy appearing first takes priority. For details, see casbin#833 and casbin#831.
model.conf:
[request_definition]
r = sub, obj, act
[policy_definition]
p = sub, obj, act, eft
[role_definition]
g = _, _
[policy_effect]
e = subjectPriority(p.eft) || deny
[matchers]
m = g(r.sub, p.sub) && r.obj == p.obj && r.act == p.actpolicy.csv
p, root, data1, read, deny
p, admin, data1, read, deny
p, editor, data1, read, deny
p, subscriber, data1, read, deny
p, jane, data1, read, allow
p, alice, data1, read, allow
g, admin, root
g, editor, admin
g, subscriber, admin
g, jane, editor
g, alice, subscriberRequest:
jane, data1, read --> true // because jane is at the bottom, her priority is higher than that of editor, admin, and root
alice, data1, read --> trueThe role hierarchy structure:
role: root
└─ role: admin
├─ role editor
│ └─ user: jane
│
└─ role: subscriber
└─ user: aliceAutomatic priority assignment:
role: root # auto priority: 30
└─ role: admin # auto priority: 20
├─ role: editor # auto priority: 10
└─ role: subscriber # auto priority: 10